Civil Liability and Private Police Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Civil Liability and Private Police Paper - Essay Exampleor its employees (also known as torts) and (2) criminal acts committed by the security company or its employees. The major semen of liabilities of the private jurisprudence is the tort law which is rooted on negligence rather than on hostility or evil inclination. Following are the usual torts committed or imputed to private police battery, assault, fuss of mental distress, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, trespass to land, trespass to personal property, negligence, defamation, and invasion of privacy. Hence, any mistake committed by a private police may be the subject of a tort lawsuit. The fourth part Amendment provides tribute to the citizens against un middling searches and seizures and arbitrary arrest and detention. A reading of the provision creates an impression that it is geared towards the protection of citizens against public authorities. In fact, even the Courts have some apprehensions in applying the said provision against private entities and individuals. In the case of Burdeau vs. McDowell (256 U.S. 465 1921), the Supreme Court Civil Liability and Private Police Paper ruled unambiguously that the provision is not applicable to complainants arrested or searched by private parties. Due to the said ruling, the private police continued to avoid all restrictions imposed upon their public counterparts. On the issue of arrests, private police whoop it up the protection afforded to private individuals on the argument that they act for and in behalf of the person, business entity or corporation that engage them thus, their employer practically transferred the latters basic right of protection of their persons and properties against unreasonable searches, seizures, and arrests. This is so in hostility of the general knowledge that the function of private police is akin to that of the public law enforcement agencies, albeit limited to the interest of their employers. However, th e conclusion is still the same that unless the private police are deputized or commissioned through a valid law, they do cannot enjoy the powers given to the public authorities. Hence, private police, when it comes to the issue of arrests and seizures, must be engrossed within the ambit of the theories of self-defense, defense of another or the property of another, crime prevention, and citizens arrest. Similarly, in cases of invasion of privacy or defamation, the private police may rely only on exercise of reasonable limitations. On the other hand, in cases of negligence, the possible defences are contributory negligence and assumption of risk by the complainant. Considering that private police are usually engaged in situations requiring restraint or detention, most practically for investigation purposes, the possibility of being held liable for assault is high. Following are the elements of assault (1) an act (2) intent to harm or make offensive contact or to cause apprehensio n (3) apprehension must be imminent and (4) apprehension is caused by the defendant. Perusal of the above-enumerated elements show the apparent absence of